That is what Mark Zuckerberg would like the new Facebook profile to be for half a billion active users. 

For most people, this is probably a stretch. But after giving the new profile a test run myself, I was surprised to find it quite enlightening. It took no more than a few seconds of scrolling to find myself curiously diving into my [Facebook] life, curious to find out how people will now perceive me based on a single page. For the first time, there is a service that successfully allows anybody to create a living document of their life if they so choose—without committing to being a blogger or overly obsessive documentarian. 

Other new features of this new profile are a little frightening. People are free to add events, posts, pictures, etc. to the past. And of course posts can still be deleted. Anyone an effectively create complete picture of their life, but one that isn't even accurate if even true. Much of this already happened on Facebook and other social networks, but now the reward for doing so (or punishment) will be that much greater.

Once this goes live on September 30th, it will be fascinating to watch how behavior on the social network will change. I can certainly say that I'll be driven to use the service more, essentially crafting a picture of my life visible to people online. Whether or not this is positive, or a step further into losing our real lives to digital ones, remains to be seen.

Also, if anyone thought Facebook would stand still while Google started innovating, I think this puts aside those assumptions.

The web has been and will continue to be a very different beast than traditional print. In my experience, even just 5 years ago a large number of designers despised the idea of going into web design—unfortunately. More than a handful saw it to be a lower form of design. Pitiful font support. Numerous layout limitations. Flash filled some holes but was mostly used for fireworks and frills rather than refined design. The web required an understanding of arcane languages meant for machines rather than humans. And worst of all, rather than enjoying the subtle textures of paper and the sweet smell of fresh ink, websites could only be viewed behind the cold glare of a monitor. Thumbing through pages in the park didn’t exist in this new digital world. No, web surfers had to push a puck around on a table and tap out directions with clunky keyboard.

But one factor above all others has always left a mark on web design. The web began and continues to be a tool for quickly dispersing information. Though unlike older mediums, it is also a two way conversation. It has turned everyone with a computer into a content creator—and this is a beautiful thing. But this also means web designers focus on designing the template for information, and all too often pay too little attention to the content itself.

This is also happens to be one of the more fascinating features of digital design. We need to digest so many more components than layout, typography, and aesthetics and brand. We think through full systems that have intelligence, flexibility, while guiding the user to content that we don’t know the specifics of until our job is done. To make matters more daunting, people consume our digital content in a variety of interactive manners across an ever increasing number of devices. I’ve often thought a digital designer is not that unlike an architect who designs a building, but realizes he or she cannot know exactly how people will use the space. We can only make well informed predictions.

All that being said, our industry is changing quickly. And I believe it’s time for more designers to push their digital creations to next level. Specifically, it is time that more of us create organic templates, with room for unique art direction that lives within rules of the original template. Designers and content creators love print because it provides a canvas to add an extra level of editorial touch that digital has rarely achieved. With print, love and care can be applied to every detail.

Every single issue of Wired Magazine has attention paid to the details. Each article has a specific story to tell, with art direction to match. This extra level of detail paid to the design of words on a page has real value and gets overlooked most of the time on the web. The layout, design, and illustration not only help tell a story, but come along with an implied sense of relevance. When someone takes the time to design the article, one will easily assume that it somehow matters more than some text thrown on a white sheet of paper.

This is missing from almost all content driven websites today. There are rarely if ever, any ways to add any specific art direction to content. All content gets funneled into the same template regardless of the story being told. There are a variety of reasons for this. Not least of which, achieving this effect is sometimes a larger technology hurtle. And until recently, content publishers have been unsure how much time and effort to invest in digital mediums. Most sites are also designed for short attention spans, more about consuming content quickly than enjoying it with any leisure. As luck would have it, we are now being encroached upon by a new class of device: the tablet. The iPad is now leading the charge for a new kind of digital delivery medium, that encourages users to slow down and digest content at a sustainable pace. Publishers now realize that digital is only threatening to overshadow print, and it is ever more important to take a second look at how content is presented digitally. We are also entering an exciting time of font support development on the web. Soon, high end typography will finally be a full reality on the web, without specialty plugins or image replacements.

There are but a handful of real world examples of designers and content creators taking advantage of editorial design aesthetic on a digital canvas. The current examples fall into two camps: blogs and magazines. A few blogs have undertaken the challenge of longer form articles, where each article gets custom art direction.